I keep hearing the term key money from commercial real estate brokers. In old England back in the day, it was basically considered a bribe, perhaps to get the keys/access to a property? Essentially as a commercial tenant, you're paying for the use of stuff, like renting fixtures.
Does anyone have any color on this? My guess is this is more applicable for restaurants, if they want to take over a space / lease, and want to make use of the existing fixtures and equipment left over from the previous tenant. So then you'd have to pay this key money to the landlord to use it essentially. Right or wrong?
P.S. From what I hear, there are no neophytes in the restaurant business. Landlords will only want to lease to an experienced restaurateur, not a noob. For example, their ideal tenant is a sous-chef who's tired and fed up with not being an owner, and wants to start their own business. They probably don't want to take a risk with an investment banker who suddenly has decided that their passion is now cooking.
Does anyone have any color on this? My guess is this is more applicable for restaurants, if they want to take over a space / lease, and want to make use of the existing fixtures and equipment left over from the previous tenant. So then you'd have to pay this key money to the landlord to use it essentially. Right or wrong?
P.S. From what I hear, there are no neophytes in the restaurant business. Landlords will only want to lease to an experienced restaurateur, not a noob. For example, their ideal tenant is a sous-chef who's tired and fed up with not being an owner, and wants to start their own business. They probably don't want to take a risk with an investment banker who suddenly has decided that their passion is now cooking.
Comment