From what I've heard, a review of a co-op's offering plan is especially important if there are still unsold shares. However, I hear there is less value for older buildings. Is this true?
So assuming the sponsor is complying with Attorney General regulations, the offering plan should include up to date financial disclosures by the sponsor who is the holder of unsold shares. These disclosures should include how many unsold shares are still outstanding and whether the holder of these unsold shares is in default on this particular co-op building or any other building.
So assuming the sponsor is complying with Attorney General regulations, the offering plan should include up to date financial disclosures by the sponsor who is the holder of unsold shares. These disclosures should include how many unsold shares are still outstanding and whether the holder of these unsold shares is in default on this particular co-op building or any other building.
Comment