Very curious about this. One of the buildings I am in keeps using this horribly rated plumbing company in Manhattan (won't name names, but they are 2.2 stars of out 5 on Google Reviews). This is despite the fact that one of the owners has been taken to small claims court by them and lost. This owner has disclosed this to everyone including the managing agent, yet the building continues to use them as their go to plumber.
How does this make sense? Wouldn't the plumber be even less incentivized to do a good job and charge less given the existing beef with one of the owners (it's a small building)?
There must be a reason that the managing agent keeps choosing this horribly rated plumber. Are they getting a kick back or referral of some sort? Hope that is illegal?
How does this make sense? Wouldn't the plumber be even less incentivized to do a good job and charge less given the existing beef with one of the owners (it's a small building)?
There must be a reason that the managing agent keeps choosing this horribly rated plumber. Are they getting a kick back or referral of some sort? Hope that is illegal?
Comment