My attorney is moving ahead with the contract. Big question is whether I should pursue a larger mortgage, for which I can get a significantly lower rate, and then re-cast it after two months to the smaller mortgage in which I'm interested.
I'd like your thoughts on how that might go over with the board. Here's probably way more info than you want on what I've been considering.
I told the seller I was going to make a down payment of >70% of the purchase price. The interest rate for that loan would be 4.625%.
A Wells Fargo (WF) mortgage banker suggested I take out a jumbo mortgage, for which he could provide me with a 4.125% interest rate, and then, three months later, recast it - put down the rest of down payment I originally intended to put down and keep the lower interest rate. Doing this:
-Might antagonize the seller
-Might jeopardize my board application. My monthly maintenance plus mortgage for the jumbo would be 28% of my gross income (including 'soft' research grant income and investment income) or 24% of my gross income if I also added back in my pre-tax deductions such as my retirement contribution.
The monthly difference in the two rates is $43. White that's not nothing - $15K over 30 years - it's also an amount I could handle. And who knows, I might sell the place five years down the road.
A mellow mortgage broker from Freedom Mortgage, whom I like personally, has warned me there's a real possibility of scaring off the board. A mortgage banker from a credit union warns me there's a risk WF might not be able to recast the mortgage as promised. And also warns me closing costs with Freedom might be high.
So - I'm leaning strongly toward sticking with the lower mortgage amount for the higher rate of 4.625%. And I'm going to get loan estimates from a few different places to compare closing costs. The credit union might wind up being the way to go.
I'd like your thoughts on how that might go over with the board. Here's probably way more info than you want on what I've been considering.
I told the seller I was going to make a down payment of >70% of the purchase price. The interest rate for that loan would be 4.625%.
A Wells Fargo (WF) mortgage banker suggested I take out a jumbo mortgage, for which he could provide me with a 4.125% interest rate, and then, three months later, recast it - put down the rest of down payment I originally intended to put down and keep the lower interest rate. Doing this:
-Might antagonize the seller
-Might jeopardize my board application. My monthly maintenance plus mortgage for the jumbo would be 28% of my gross income (including 'soft' research grant income and investment income) or 24% of my gross income if I also added back in my pre-tax deductions such as my retirement contribution.
The monthly difference in the two rates is $43. White that's not nothing - $15K over 30 years - it's also an amount I could handle. And who knows, I might sell the place five years down the road.
A mellow mortgage broker from Freedom Mortgage, whom I like personally, has warned me there's a real possibility of scaring off the board. A mortgage banker from a credit union warns me there's a risk WF might not be able to recast the mortgage as promised. And also warns me closing costs with Freedom might be high.
So - I'm leaning strongly toward sticking with the lower mortgage amount for the higher rate of 4.625%. And I'm going to get loan estimates from a few different places to compare closing costs. The credit union might wind up being the way to go.
Comment